There's a version of this story where Tony Petitti is the hero. A forward-thinking commissioner who looked at a 12-team College Football Playoff, saw millions of fans still locked out of the conversation by November, and decided to do something about it. In that version, he's fighting for more access, more meaningful games, more teams with skin in the game deep into the regular season. It's a compelling pitch.
Then there's the version that's actually been playing out — the one where Petitti's proposals have been either too aggressive for the rest of the room, too self-serving for anyone to accept, or simply too complicated to unpack before a deadline expires. That version is a lot messier. And after more than a year of negotiations, blown deadlines, and a College Football Playoff that will remain at 12 teams for at least one more season, the mess is very much still ongoing.
The Proposal That Started It All
Petitti's original 16-team vision made sense on the surface — four automatic bids for the Big Ten, four for the SEC, two apiece for the ACC and Big 12, one for a Group of Five champion, and three at-large selections. The architecture was built around the idea that conference record is the backbone of playoff access, that teams should earn their way in through a defined path rather than at the mercy of a selection committee that — as Petitti has noted repeatedly — has an increasingly impossible job.
The conference play-in concept was even more interesting. If a team claws through nine Big Ten games and finishes in the top six, they earn the right to play their way into the playoff bracket on Championship Weekend. That's not a handout. That's earned. And as Petitti pointed out, it opens the door for more high-profile non-conference scheduling — because if your playoff access is tied to conference record rather than strength-of-schedule optics, a tough road loss to an SEC or Big 12 team impacts your seeding but doesn't kill your access. That's actually a pretty intelligent restructuring of incentives.
But here's where the plot thickens.
The Part Everyone Else Rejected
The model Petitti proposed didn't just create a path. It created a tiered system — one where the Big Ten and SEC operated at a different level of access than the ACC and Big 12. Two guaranteed spots versus four is a gap that hits different when you're the league staring at the short end of it. ACC commissioner Jim Phillips took the same stance; the SEC's Greg Sankey voiced strong preference for a 16-team model based on at-large bids rather than uneven automatic qualifiers. Even with the Big Ten's framework theoretically giving everyone a shot through at-large bids, the codified inequity was a non-starter for the conferences that would be on the losing end.
The SEC's resistance was particularly pointed. Sankey consistently said his league favors playoff models with more at-large bids, not more automatic bids, and that CFP expansion cannot occur without agreement from both the SEC and the Big Ten. The math here is brutal: the two most powerful conferences in college football can't pass expansion without each other, and they couldn't agree on anything.
So Petitti, facing a wall of opposition, did what any reasonable negotiator might do — he blew past 16 entirely and started floating 24- and 28-team models. Which, to put it charitably, did not help.
The Escalation Nobody Asked For
The Big Ten internally discussed 24- and 28-team playoff models, with some versions eliminating conference championship games entirely and starting the playoff on the first weekend of December. The reaction from the rest of college football was somewhere between bewilderment and outright refusal. The FCS has 24 teams in its playoff. Nobody's holding that up as the gold standard.
The world is not clamoring for 20-plus competitors playing for the national championship — there is no groundswell of support for such a thing. But the Big Ten kept pushing. By the time commissioners converged in Miami in January for their annual pre-championship meeting, the four power conference leaders made no headway, with Petitti pushing for 24 teams while Sankey stuck with 16. The playoff stayed at 12.
It's worth pausing to appreciate the irony here. Petitti entered this entire conversation arguing that 16 teams doesn't provide enough access. He ended up being the reason the sport stayed at 12.
The Presidential Wildcard
If the commissioner politics weren't complicated enough, the federal government decided to pull up a chair. A 14-person presidential media committee — its existence supported by the White House — began holding real conversations about the future of the postseason. President Trump even weighed in personally, announcing he'd sign an executive order protecting the Army-Navy game from any scheduling complications that a playoff expansion might create. Welcome to college football in 2026, where the Commander-in-Chief has playoff opinions and isn't afraid to post about them the night before the national championship game.
It's the kind of subplot that would feel like a satirical overreach if it weren't completely real. The sport that once celebrated the purity of its regular season — where every game theoretically mattered in a way no other sport could match — is now navigating a negotiation that involves broadcast executives, congressional pressure, conference championship media rights contracts, and a sitting president's feelings about a service academy rivalry game.
Where It Actually Stands
As of now, the CFP remains at 12 teams for the 2026 season. After decision-makers failed to reach an expansion agreement, the current 12-team model will be used for the 2026-27 season. The next deadline to set a new format for 2027 is December 1, 2026. That's the window Petitti, Sankey, and everyone else has to figure this out.
The ACC has thrown its support behind the 24-team model. ACC commissioner Jim Phillips argued that when national championship-caliber teams are being left out of the playoff, the current number isn't right — pointing to unbeaten Florida State getting left out in 2023 and Notre Dame's exclusion last season as evidence. The Big 12's Brett Yormark has signaled openness to 24 if the automatic qualifier structure treats all power conferences equally. The SEC is still at 16, Sankey hasn't moved, and Petitti — who started all of this by saying 16 wasn't enough — is now the loudest voice for doubling the field.
ESPN analyst Paul Finebaum summarized the skeptic's case cleanly: the sport probably doesn't have 16 true national title contenders, let alone 24. It's a legitimate concern. The regular season's magic — the reason a Week 2 non-conference game can feel like it matters — is directly tied to scarcity. The more spots available, the more November starts to feel like February in the NBA.
The Closing Take
Here's the thing about Tony Petitti's access argument: he's not wrong about the problem. A 12-team field in a sport with four major conferences and 65-plus programs fighting for relevance does leave people out. Indiana won the national championship last season as the Big Ten's third straight title winner, but fans in Sun Belt country, fans following a 10-win Big 12 program that got bumped, fans of a Group of Five team that ran the table — they know the feeling of watching the bracket fill without their team's name in it.
But access isn't just about how many teams get in. It's about whether the teams that get in earned it in a way that the rest of the sport respects. Petitti's proposals — first with unequal automatic qualifiers, then with a field so large it would require eliminating conference championship games — have consistently asked the rest of college football to accept an architecture that benefits the Big Ten most. That's not a coalition-building strategy. That's a power play dressed up in access language.
The irony is that the clearest path to more access — a clean 16-team field with five conference champions and 11 at-larges, the model that three of four power conferences already supported — was sitting right there the whole time. Petitti just couldn't get to yes on it. The question heading into December's deadline is whether he can finally do what the rest of the sport has been waiting on: find a format that works for everyone, not just the Big Ten. Because right now, the commissioner who wants more access is the one keeping the door closed.
Trusted By Programs Across The Country
